The Scandal of Wine Spectator Awards of Excellence
"...with such a large number of winners, perhaps competition is too strong a word. Of the 3,360 awards granted this year, from a pool of 3,573 entrants, 2,808 received the basic award. Only the winners of the Grand Award, the magazine's top award, of which there are 89 this year, are ever inspected; 3,271 restaurants simply sent in copies of their wine lists and menus, a cover sheet describing their wine programs and a check for $175 - and walked away winners."
This means that 94% of the applicants "earned" an award on some level.
Fast forward to 2008. The entrance fee is now $250, and this year more than 4000 restaurants, uh, earned the award. And Wine Spectator, well, booked more than a million in fees.
Ironically, though, this isn't really the scandal I'm referring to. That was the work of one Robin Goldstein, a wine blogger and writer who manufactured a nonexistent restaurant in Milan, Italy, paid the fee and "won" an award. Frankly, it doesn't really bother me, and it shouldn't bother you too much. After all, Goldstein put a lot of work into appearing legitimate - he built a website, created a extensive menu and wine list, and even established a working Milan phone and fax number as required by the application.
For its part, Wine Spectator did call the restaurant to verify the information, and left a voicemail (although the voicemail was after the "award" and it was a sales pitch for an ad). So you might say that what Mr. Goldstein did is entrapment - unfair to Wine Spectator and to consumers. And hey, had I been preparing to visit Milan, and run across his website, I might have made reservations at his non-existent establishment myself.
So you might conclude that the fictional Osteria l'Intrepido restaurant's award was an exception, and the result of an elaborate scam. And you might further still think that a Wine Spectator Award of Excellence still represents, oh, I don't know, maybe good value, wide selection, and good pairing opportunities with things on the menu. After all, they're still conferred by experts at one of the world's leading wine consumer publications, right?
Wrong. All it really means, in most cases, is that the restaurant paid the price of admission and sent in some paperwork. And as Goldstein adds in his blog, "it's also troubling that the award doesn't seem to be particularly tied to the quality of the wine list, even by Wine Spectator's own standards. Although the main wine list that I submitted was made up of fairly standard Italian-focused selections, Osteria L'Intrepido's 'reserve wine list' was largely chosen from among the lowest-scoring Italian wines in Wine Spectator over the past 20 years.
The lesson here? Don't depend on others to tell you what's good - not Parker, not Broadbent, not me, not Wine Spectator or Wine Enthusiast, not your neighbor. It's ok to read reviews but remember they are someone else's taste buds and someone else's opinion. Instead, learn the basics and then enjoy the experience of tasting wines and thinking critically about why you like them, and how to pair them up with the foods you like. And before you head to a restaurant, do a little homework. As homework goes, it's not as bad as digging ditches.
And frankly, too, this isn't that big a deal, warranting such outrage, is it? We've got military men and women dying in Iraq and Afghanistan. An economy in the toilet. And people losing their houses, jobs and health insurance daily. Wine is supposed to be about fun.




